Numerous scholarly books and texts designed for classroom use about the field of corrections have been researched, written and published. The overall tenor of these works, however, is conservative, emphasising a management perspective, and outlining the nuts and bolts of how prisons work, the job functions of correctional workers, conditions inside correctional facilities, the different types of inmates, etc.
There is an underlying logic to this instructional content. To begin with, corrections is typically taught in community colleges and universities as part of a larger curriculum in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Putting pure interest aside, students who take classes in this field are typically either current or prospective criminal justice practitioners. They believe that knowing about jails, prisons, inmates, policies, etc. might assist them in their jobs, enable them to secure work in this subfield, or help them to decide if they want a career as a correctional worker or administrator. But this approach to pedagogy is usually system affirming, one that seeks to reinforce rather than change the status quo.
Criminologists, however, should avoid this perspective to the subject. We should always strive to improve the criminal justice system, to apply the knowledge we have accumulated, to improve working conditions, and to increase the likelihood that incarcerated people re-enter society rehabilitated. Few of the books on jails and prisons, however, approach the subject in a critical manner.
That being said, approximately three decades ago, a new academic perspective emerged – one that prioritised the voices of incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals. Convict Criminology was born not only to share the lived experience insights of this often ignored or marginalised group, but also to assist them in earning doctoral degrees and finding their rightful place in academia.
In addition to its noble goals, Convict Criminology has also encompassed strong mentoring, teaching, activist and public policy components.
Many individuals who have been exposed to and/or adopted the Convict Criminology approach have assisted numerous inmates and formerly incarcerated people. These men and women, either when they are behind bars or released, find it liberating, recognise that in terms of the knowledge they have accumulated (between the time of their initial arrest to that of release), their lived experience might advance the scholarly field of corrections, criminology and criminal justice.
Over the years, a significant amount of scholarship on Convict Criminology has been published, including peer-reviewed articles, chapters and books. It was only a matter of time before a comprehensive text consolidating and interpreting the existing literature on Convict Criminology was available.
Introduction to Convict Criminology traces the history of Convict Criminology and its numerous accomplishments. It reviews the challenges of and solutions to teaching convicts and formerly incarcerated individuals, mentoring convicts and formerly incarcerated students; activism and public policy work; and the future of Convict Criminology.
Convict Criminology is not only a critical approach to the study of corrections, criminology and criminal justice, but it has also given hope to numerous men and women. One must keep in mind that the whole Convict Criminology approach is not simply for people who are convicts or ex-convicts, but also for people interested in the Convict Criminology praxis who have had contact or been involved with, or impacted by, the criminal justice system. Although they may not have been incarcerated, they may have been arrested, charged but not convicted of a criminal offence, may have a criminal record but did not serve time, or they may have a loved one who was incarcerated.
Convict Criminology could not have achieved so much without the support of numerous individuals committed to its goals. And in many respects this book is a result of these efforts.
Jeffrey Ian Ross is Professor in the School of Criminal Justice and Research Fellow with the Center for International and Comparative Law and the Schaefer Center for Public Policy at the University of Baltimore.
The views and opinions expressed on this blog site are solely those of the original blog post authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the Policy Press and/or any/all contributors to this site.
Image: Gwénaëlle Moalic Lorre
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2024-04-15-at-8.09.24 PM.png426710Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2024-04-15 18:22:282024-04-15 19:57:13Criminology to challenge the status quo
Last week during a campaign event, held in Grand Rapids, Michigan, after former President Donald Trump’s xenophobic rant, James Tignanelli, head of the Police Officers Association of Michigan (representing 10,000 members) announced that the organization which he leads, was endorsing the former President’s bid for reelection.
Historically this kind of support, should come as no surprise. Police officer associations, organizations and unions (not all the same) have endorsed candidates (typically Republican) running for all levels of political office. Moreover, in March 2024, the International Union of Police Associations (with its 10,000 members) and the Florida Police Benevolent Association (FBPA), Florida’s largest law enforcement union also gave their blessing to Trump’s reelection bid.
That being said, although the rank and file law enforcement officers can vote their own consciences, current police union endorsements appear unusual, if not contradictory, when one is to consider the events of January 6, 2021, when Trump encouraged a large unruly mob to storm the capitol.
Not only did the public see televised images of insurrectionists breaking into the capitol, but beating and injuring Capitol Police and other law enforcement officers who were sent in to end the siege. In the end there were numerous injuries and a handful of deaths, and several criminal indictments, and convictions of insurrectionists.
From their role as strike breakers to policing protests, police (more specifically their unions and associations) have always been a conservative lot. But supporting Trump in this manner is unusual in this current context.
This begs a number of questions.
Although the endorsement was criticized by a handful of Trump critics, and raised eyebrows in selected quarters of social media, the largest labor organizations representing the interests of police in the United States, such as the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) (355,000 members); and National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO) (241,000 members) were silent. Maybe they are waiting to see if Trump is convicted of criminal charges, but given their 2020 endorsements of Trump, it’s quite likely that they will endorse Trump in 2024.
Thus, beyond the obvious, (i.e., Trumps approach to law and order, and the border crisis) why are the police officer unions, associations and organizations enabling Trump?
It might be that the police unions, and their heads want more national attention and by staking out a controversial position like supporting Trump they believe that it’s a good way to go about accomplishing this.
Alternatively, they don’t know any better. They may be low information voters. And thus, it they have taken a position regardless of the information that is presented to them.
More realistically, there is a general inability among many of Trump’s supporters to see or recognize contradictions in their actions and beliefs. Often they seem to be comfortable with compartmentalizing beliefs that to other people would seem to be contradictory. They may also be suffering like many of us from cognitive inflexibility.
So, how might we respond to police unions supporting Trump?
It’s tempting to put both hands in the air and say that you give up.
However, those of us who work in or with the criminal justice profession—be it as practitioners, instructors, or scholars—possess a unique vantage point that allows us to wield some influence.
Many of our students are former, current, or aspiring law enforcement officers, thus offering us a direct avenue for engagement. By actively confronting the contradictions within their beliefs, we might be able to provide them a deeper understanding. This is not easy and will involve regular and consistent dialogue and mentorship, where we attempt to professionally dissect their perspectives and challenge their ingrained notions. Through these efforts, we might be able to foster critical introspection, not only affecting their political beliefs, but with this knowledge, they may also be able to influence their co-workers so that they too make more critical decisions about their political future.
Photo Credit:
Photographer: Mostafa Bassim
Title: Police clash with a mob of Trump supporters who breached security and stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021.
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2024-04-07-at-9.04.32 PM.png10722040Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2024-04-07 18:34:152024-04-08 09:25:56A police union’s endorsement of Trump is not a happy one
Similar to bustling transportation hubs, concert venues, and sporting arenas, the waiting rooms of large inner-city hospital emergency departments in the United States, and many other advanced industrialized countries, can be chaotic and challenging environments to navigate. More specifically, beyond their role as places of healing, these urban public spaces are environments where power dynamics and status roles are constantly negotiated and contested.
Description of the Situation
Stepping into a hospital emergency department waiting room reveals a scene of varied activity: security personnel and possibly police stationed at the entrance, receptionists and nurses managing intake, and patients (and the people who may accompany them) anxiously awaiting their turn for care. Signs, doors, and counters appear to be everywhere.
Although many staff members exhibit care and compassion, others, often because of burnout and physical and emotional fatigue from shift work, and overly demanding and sometimes rude patrons, and sometimes violence by actual and prospective patients, may appear jaded, overly bureaucratic or even hostile. Meanwhile patients may feel processed, and frequently encounter directives like “Please take your turn” and “Please sit down until your name is called,” amidst an atmosphere of impatience and tension.
Both emergency department workers and patients, along with their relatives or friends, may experience a range of emotions, finding the experience frustrating, challenging, and at times, unexpectedly interesting. However, the environment can also evoke feelings of depression and anxiety.
In short, emergency departments operate on the principle of triage, prioritizing those with life-threatening conditions while managing resources to address the needs of all patients. Influenced by economic constraints, this leads to a rationing of care. Patients arrive via emergency medical services, police transport, or as walk-ins, representing a diverse spectrum of demographics and health conditions. Among them are the poor, homeless, elderly, mentally ill, victims of street and domestic violence, and substance-dependent individuals, often with complex and urgent medical and psychiatric needs.
Significance of the Issue
In societies where access to healthcare is rationed, preventative care remains elusive for many urban dwellers, inner-city emergency departments serve as the last resort for those in need. The waiting rooms are often full with lower socioeconomic individuals who face barriers to accessing timely and adequate healthcare, exacerbating health disparities. The lack of access to primary care providers contributes to the overutilization of emergency services, particularly by marginalized populations, including the homeless. Class dynamics also come into play, with privileged individuals who visit the ER sometimes expecting preferential treatment based on their social status.
The ebb and flow of patients in emergency departments vary with the time of day and season, reflecting seasonal health trends, climatic conditions, and local demographics. People who show up in the emergency rooms sometimes may do so with open sores, poor hygiene, coughing and hacking. Within the waiting room, tensions simmer as individuals vie for attention, with intake nurses assuming the roles of mediators and gatekeepers.
Proposed Solutions
Addressing the challenges inherent in inner-city emergency department waiting rooms requires multifaceted strategies. These include, but are not limited to:
Enhanced Patient Experience: Introducing entertainment options such as TVs and magazines can alleviate boredom and reduce tension. Clear communication about wait times and procedures can manage expectations and reduce anxiety.
Support for Staff: Investing in training programs and support services can equip staff with the necessary skills to navigate challenging interactions and mitigate burnout.
Community Outreach: Educating the community about the appropriate use of emergency departments and promoting access to primary care can reduce reliance on emergency services for non-urgent needs.
Streamlined Processes: Optimizing triage and intake procedures can minimize wait times and ensure timely access to care for those with urgent medical needs.
Addressing Healthcare Inequities: Advocating for policies aimed at improving access to primary care and addressing social determinants of health is crucial to reducing disparities in emergency department utilization.
Collaborative Partnerships: Engaging with local government agencies and community organizations to develop holistic approaches to healthcare delivery can address underlying systemic issues contributing to frequent emergency department visits.
In conclusion, inner-city emergency department waiting rooms serve as microcosms of broader societal inequities in healthcare access. By one or more of these suggestions, we might be able to create more equitable and compassionate healthcare systems for all individuals, regardless of socioeconomic status and reduce the kinds of challenges that are manifest in places like emergency rooms of inner city hospitals.
Photo Credit:
Photographer: Micheal
Title: Emergency Room
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/2622076978_d17419e328_o.jpg6831024Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2024-03-31 12:08:032024-09-22 12:16:52Inner city hospital emergency department waiting rooms as places of power and contestation
Criminology to challenge the status quo
/by Jeffrey Ian Ross(This article was originally published on Transforming Society April 15, 2024).
Numerous scholarly books and texts designed for classroom use about the field of corrections have been researched, written and published. The overall tenor of these works, however, is conservative, emphasising a management perspective, and outlining the nuts and bolts of how prisons work, the job functions of correctional workers, conditions inside correctional facilities, the different types of inmates, etc.
There is an underlying logic to this instructional content. To begin with, corrections is typically taught in community colleges and universities as part of a larger curriculum in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Putting pure interest aside, students who take classes in this field are typically either current or prospective criminal justice practitioners. They believe that knowing about jails, prisons, inmates, policies, etc. might assist them in their jobs, enable them to secure work in this subfield, or help them to decide if they want a career as a correctional worker or administrator. But this approach to pedagogy is usually system affirming, one that seeks to reinforce rather than change the status quo.
Criminologists, however, should avoid this perspective to the subject. We should always strive to improve the criminal justice system, to apply the knowledge we have accumulated, to improve working conditions, and to increase the likelihood that incarcerated people re-enter society rehabilitated. Few of the books on jails and prisons, however, approach the subject in a critical manner.
That being said, approximately three decades ago, a new academic perspective emerged – one that prioritised the voices of incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals. Convict Criminology was born not only to share the lived experience insights of this often ignored or marginalised group, but also to assist them in earning doctoral degrees and finding their rightful place in academia.
In addition to its noble goals, Convict Criminology has also encompassed strong mentoring, teaching, activist and public policy components.
Many individuals who have been exposed to and/or adopted the Convict Criminology approach have assisted numerous inmates and formerly incarcerated people. These men and women, either when they are behind bars or released, find it liberating, recognise that in terms of the knowledge they have accumulated (between the time of their initial arrest to that of release), their lived experience might advance the scholarly field of corrections, criminology and criminal justice.
Over the years, a significant amount of scholarship on Convict Criminology has been published, including peer-reviewed articles, chapters and books. It was only a matter of time before a comprehensive text consolidating and interpreting the existing literature on Convict Criminology was available.
Introduction to Convict Criminology traces the history of Convict Criminology and its numerous accomplishments. It reviews the challenges of and solutions to teaching convicts and formerly incarcerated individuals, mentoring convicts and formerly incarcerated students; activism and public policy work; and the future of Convict Criminology.
Convict Criminology is not only a critical approach to the study of corrections, criminology and criminal justice, but it has also given hope to numerous men and women. One must keep in mind that the whole Convict Criminology approach is not simply for people who are convicts or ex-convicts, but also for people interested in the Convict Criminology praxis who have had contact or been involved with, or impacted by, the criminal justice system. Although they may not have been incarcerated, they may have been arrested, charged but not convicted of a criminal offence, may have a criminal record but did not serve time, or they may have a loved one who was incarcerated.
Convict Criminology could not have achieved so much without the support of numerous individuals committed to its goals. And in many respects this book is a result of these efforts.
Jeffrey Ian Ross is Professor in the School of Criminal Justice and Research Fellow with the Center for International and Comparative Law and the Schaefer Center for Public Policy at the University of Baltimore.
Introduction to Convict Criminology By Jeffrey Ian Ross is available on the Bristol University Press website. Order the book here for £27.99.
Bristol University Press/Policy Press newsletter subscribers receive a 25% discount – sign up here.
Follow Transforming Society so we can let you know when new articles publish.
The views and opinions expressed on this blog site are solely those of the original blog post authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the Policy Press and/or any/all contributors to this site.
Image: Gwénaëlle Moalic Lorre
A police union’s endorsement of Trump is not a happy one
/by Jeffrey Ian RossLast week during a campaign event, held in Grand Rapids, Michigan, after former President Donald Trump’s xenophobic rant, James Tignanelli, head of the Police Officers Association of Michigan (representing 10,000 members) announced that the organization which he leads, was endorsing the former President’s bid for reelection.
Historically this kind of support, should come as no surprise. Police officer associations, organizations and unions (not all the same) have endorsed candidates (typically Republican) running for all levels of political office. Moreover, in March 2024, the International Union of Police Associations (with its 10,000 members) and the Florida Police Benevolent Association (FBPA), Florida’s largest law enforcement union also gave their blessing to Trump’s reelection bid.
That being said, although the rank and file law enforcement officers can vote their own consciences, current police union endorsements appear unusual, if not contradictory, when one is to consider the events of January 6, 2021, when Trump encouraged a large unruly mob to storm the capitol.
Not only did the public see televised images of insurrectionists breaking into the capitol, but beating and injuring Capitol Police and other law enforcement officers who were sent in to end the siege. In the end there were numerous injuries and a handful of deaths, and several criminal indictments, and convictions of insurrectionists.
From their role as strike breakers to policing protests, police (more specifically their unions and associations) have always been a conservative lot. But supporting Trump in this manner is unusual in this current context.
This begs a number of questions.
Although the endorsement was criticized by a handful of Trump critics, and raised eyebrows in selected quarters of social media, the largest labor organizations representing the interests of police in the United States, such as the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) (355,000 members); and National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO) (241,000 members) were silent. Maybe they are waiting to see if Trump is convicted of criminal charges, but given their 2020 endorsements of Trump, it’s quite likely that they will endorse Trump in 2024.
Thus, beyond the obvious, (i.e., Trumps approach to law and order, and the border crisis) why are the police officer unions, associations and organizations enabling Trump?
It might be that the police unions, and their heads want more national attention and by staking out a controversial position like supporting Trump they believe that it’s a good way to go about accomplishing this.
Alternatively, they don’t know any better. They may be low information voters. And thus, it they have taken a position regardless of the information that is presented to them.
More realistically, there is a general inability among many of Trump’s supporters to see or recognize contradictions in their actions and beliefs. Often they seem to be comfortable with compartmentalizing beliefs that to other people would seem to be contradictory. They may also be suffering like many of us from cognitive inflexibility.
So, how might we respond to police unions supporting Trump?
It’s tempting to put both hands in the air and say that you give up.
However, those of us who work in or with the criminal justice profession—be it as practitioners, instructors, or scholars—possess a unique vantage point that allows us to wield some influence.
Many of our students are former, current, or aspiring law enforcement officers, thus offering us a direct avenue for engagement. By actively confronting the contradictions within their beliefs, we might be able to provide them a deeper understanding. This is not easy and will involve regular and consistent dialogue and mentorship, where we attempt to professionally dissect their perspectives and challenge their ingrained notions. Through these efforts, we might be able to foster critical introspection, not only affecting their political beliefs, but with this knowledge, they may also be able to influence their co-workers so that they too make more critical decisions about their political future.
Photo Credit:
Photographer: Mostafa Bassim
Title: Police clash with a mob of Trump supporters who breached security and stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021.
Inner city hospital emergency department waiting rooms as places of power and contestation
/by Jeffrey Ian RossSimilar to bustling transportation hubs, concert venues, and sporting arenas, the waiting rooms of large inner-city hospital emergency departments in the United States, and many other advanced industrialized countries, can be chaotic and challenging environments to navigate. More specifically, beyond their role as places of healing, these urban public spaces are environments where power dynamics and status roles are constantly negotiated and contested.
Description of the Situation
Stepping into a hospital emergency department waiting room reveals a scene of varied activity: security personnel and possibly police stationed at the entrance, receptionists and nurses managing intake, and patients (and the people who may accompany them) anxiously awaiting their turn for care. Signs, doors, and counters appear to be everywhere.
Although many staff members exhibit care and compassion, others, often because of burnout and physical and emotional fatigue from shift work, and overly demanding and sometimes rude patrons, and sometimes violence by actual and prospective patients, may appear jaded, overly bureaucratic or even hostile. Meanwhile patients may feel processed, and frequently encounter directives like “Please take your turn” and “Please sit down until your name is called,” amidst an atmosphere of impatience and tension.
Both emergency department workers and patients, along with their relatives or friends, may experience a range of emotions, finding the experience frustrating, challenging, and at times, unexpectedly interesting. However, the environment can also evoke feelings of depression and anxiety.
In short, emergency departments operate on the principle of triage, prioritizing those with life-threatening conditions while managing resources to address the needs of all patients. Influenced by economic constraints, this leads to a rationing of care. Patients arrive via emergency medical services, police transport, or as walk-ins, representing a diverse spectrum of demographics and health conditions. Among them are the poor, homeless, elderly, mentally ill, victims of street and domestic violence, and substance-dependent individuals, often with complex and urgent medical and psychiatric needs.
Significance of the Issue
In societies where access to healthcare is rationed, preventative care remains elusive for many urban dwellers, inner-city emergency departments serve as the last resort for those in need. The waiting rooms are often full with lower socioeconomic individuals who face barriers to accessing timely and adequate healthcare, exacerbating health disparities. The lack of access to primary care providers contributes to the overutilization of emergency services, particularly by marginalized populations, including the homeless. Class dynamics also come into play, with privileged individuals who visit the ER sometimes expecting preferential treatment based on their social status.
The ebb and flow of patients in emergency departments vary with the time of day and season, reflecting seasonal health trends, climatic conditions, and local demographics. People who show up in the emergency rooms sometimes may do so with open sores, poor hygiene, coughing and hacking. Within the waiting room, tensions simmer as individuals vie for attention, with intake nurses assuming the roles of mediators and gatekeepers.
Proposed Solutions
Addressing the challenges inherent in inner-city emergency department waiting rooms requires multifaceted strategies. These include, but are not limited to:
Enhanced Patient Experience: Introducing entertainment options such as TVs and magazines can alleviate boredom and reduce tension. Clear communication about wait times and procedures can manage expectations and reduce anxiety.
Support for Staff: Investing in training programs and support services can equip staff with the necessary skills to navigate challenging interactions and mitigate burnout.
Community Outreach: Educating the community about the appropriate use of emergency departments and promoting access to primary care can reduce reliance on emergency services for non-urgent needs.
Streamlined Processes: Optimizing triage and intake procedures can minimize wait times and ensure timely access to care for those with urgent medical needs.
Addressing Healthcare Inequities: Advocating for policies aimed at improving access to primary care and addressing social determinants of health is crucial to reducing disparities in emergency department utilization.
Collaborative Partnerships: Engaging with local government agencies and community organizations to develop holistic approaches to healthcare delivery can address underlying systemic issues contributing to frequent emergency department visits.
In conclusion, inner-city emergency department waiting rooms serve as microcosms of broader societal inequities in healthcare access. By one or more of these suggestions, we might be able to create more equitable and compassionate healthcare systems for all individuals, regardless of socioeconomic status and reduce the kinds of challenges that are manifest in places like emergency rooms of inner city hospitals.
Photo Credit:
Photographer: Micheal
Title: Emergency Room