Blog

Anti-Musk Graffiti & Street Art as a Rejection of Power, Capitalism, and Celebrity

Over the past two decades, tech billionaire Elon Musk—pivotal in the creation of PayPal, and founder of Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink, as well as owner of Twitter (now X)—has been both lavishly praised and sharply criticized.

Many tech aficionados, consider Musk to be a genius and similar to the Starship Enterprise, in the television series and movies Star Trek, idolized as someone willing to “boldly go where no one has gone before.”

But while some view Musk as a brilliant visionary, others see him as hypocritical in his words and actions.

Musk’s success is also intertwined with protracted labor struggles, negative environmental impacts, and the embodiment of unchecked political power.

He is frequently criticized for being reckless and attention-seeking, behaviors that  led to his ousting from leadership roles at both PayPal and Tesla.

Recently, Musk has transitioned into one of second-term President Donald J. Trump’s most prominent and vocal supporters.

For a figure as polarizing as Musk, such alignments only make him more controversial.

Thus, it’s no surprise that Musk has become a subject of graffiti and street art, (not to mention negative light projection images), not just in the United States, but in selected cities around the world.

Much of this visual communication is not flattering.

Anti-Musk graffiti and street art is more than mere vandalism; it critiques the systems Musk represents—extreme wealth, inequality, labor exploitation, unchecked technological advancement, and environmental harm.

The Development of Anti-Musk Graffiti and Street Art

The rise of anti-Musk graffiti/street art is part of a broader trend where this type of urban art serves as a visual counter-narrative to the unchecked power of people, states, and things.

Throughout the world, in large urban centers,  graffiti and street art has emerged as a tool for expressing public dissatisfaction, that also challenges the constant slick public relations and advertising campaigns supporting Silicon Valley elites and their corporations.

Musk’s ascent to global fame cast him as the “cool billionaire” — a maverick who wasn’t just in it for the money, but claimed to be changing the world. As Tesla became the leading manufacturer of electric cars, his net worth increased exponentially, as did public attention directed towards the negative business practices of his companies and his lifestyle.

The contradictions surrounding Musk, and his erratic behavior brought him under greater scrutiny. Many critiques, including numerous articles and respected books, began to challenge the previously flattering media narratives surrounding him.

Tesla’s drive to dominate the electric vehicle market initially garnered environmental praise, but labor practices, the environmental toll of lithium mining, and Musk’s controversial social media postings created a negative backlash.

As early as 2018, anti-Musk/Tesla graffiti could be seen in the Bay area (including Palo Alto, Freemont, and San Francisco).  Initially graffiti writers were critical of Tesla’s work culture. Tesla factory workers facing grueling hours, difficult conditions, racism, sexism, and there were allegations of union-busting, Musk became a symbol of corporate exploitation.

In  2023, in San Francisco, graffiti writers responded by painting “Musk = Greed,” ”Elon Gentrifier,” and “Elon Sucks,” on all manner of surfaces, especially as Tesla’s expansion symbolized gentrification, income inequality, housing pressures, and social disruption attributed to the local area’s tech boom.

For environmental activists, his lifestyle — marked by private jets and opulent mansions — the support of lithium mining (used in the batteries of Tesla cars) in various countries represented a hypocrisy at odds with his public image of a planet-saving visionary.

In Berlin, where Tesla’s Gigafactory looms as both a symbol of technological advancement and environmental destruction. Although Tesla commissioned well-respected graffiti, street artists and muralists to paint large pieces on the side of the buildings,  in 2021 graffiti, some of which included “Stop Tesla,” appeared questioning the factory’s impact on the local ecosystem.

In 2022, in Austin, Texas graffiti near Tesla’s headquarters, graffiti criticized the factory’s impact on local water and housing, with phrases like “Water for People, Not Profits.”

In 2022, when Musk was attempting to buy Twitter, he tried to portray himself as a free speech advocate. But after purchasing a controlling interest in Twitter (now X), this claim was quickly undermined when he banned certain accounts and individuals from the platform while removing guardrails on racists and other groups promoting harmful content. (Not to mention enabling Trump to return to this social media platform). His inflammatory posts on X did not serve to burnish his reputation. In 2022 anti-Musk street art started appearing in Hong Kong 2022) following his shifts in X policy, that would effectively censor anti-PRC content. In 2023, graffiti emerged in Brooklyn (2023) critiquing Musk’s layoffs and management style at X.

More recently, his private exchanges with Vladimir Putin (ostensibly an enemy of the United States), and involvement in the Ukraine conflict — particularly through his provision of satellite technology to Ukrainian forces (but denying access in certain strategic zones— have added to the animosity.

In June 2024, in Fort Lauderdale, 34 Tesla Cybertrucks were vandalized with graffiti, each one marked with the expression, “Fuck Elon.” It’s unclear whether the animosity was aimed specifically at Musk, Tesla, or a combination of both.

Ironically consumers can purchase a Cybertruck with a “graffiti wrap,” a eye-catching paint job that resembles hip hop style graffiti (another reminder of the co-optation and commodification of graffiti and street art).

Graffiti and Street Art as Resistance

The anti-Musk graffiti and street art do more than critique Musk as an individual; they critique the broader systems of capitalist (more specifically corporate) exploitation that he represents.

In this sense Musk, is not just the founder of numerous prominent tech companies, but the face of a new era of tech-driven capitalism in which billionaires like him accumulate vast amounts of wealth while the workers who make it possible remain underpaid and overworked, and environmental degradation is ignored (or minimized).

The slogan “Musk = Exploiter” scrawled on a wall is not just about Musk; it’s a condemnation of the entire model of labor and wealth generation that has come to define Silicon Valley. In this sense, the graffiti serves as a rejection not just of Musk’s persona, but of the societal framework that elevates billionaires like him to god-like status.

Graffiti and Street Art as a vehicle to call attention to Society’s Contradictions

Anti-Musk graffiti and street art isn’t just a protest against one man’s actions—it’s a critique of people and organizations like him, where the rich grow richer, and the planet’s resources continue to be depleted in the name of innovation.

It’s also a push back against the broader neoliberal system that enables figures like him to rise to prominence. Musk isn’t merely a tech mogul; he represents the contradictions central to modern capitalism: how acquiring wealth is often done at the expense of  inequality, environmental degradation, and labor exploitation.

Some, but not all, graffiti and street art attempts to draw public attention to these contradictions.

In a world where the divide between the ultra-wealthy and powerful interests and the rest of the world grows wider,  graffiti and street art remains an important weapon of the weak to offer a modicum of resistance to the people, organizations, and movements that threaten wider society.

photo credit

Photographer: Eden, Janine and Jim

Title: Musk Lightyear

How to Respond in These Uncertain Times

In the next few days (Tuesday, November 5), the United States faces one of the most consequential elections in its 248-year history.

Should Kamala Harris win, Donald Trump and his MAGA loyalists are unlikely to concede peacefully.

Trump and his Republican supporters have made it clear, and his followers expect him to challenge unfavorable results—not only through litigation, his favored approach, but through various other means too.

If Trump prevails, we face the risk of intensified political and economic instability. Prospects for growth—whether in real estate or business—may feel too risky for many.

Several respected experts and organizations that monitor this sort of thing have predicted a potential downturn, and an environment of heightened volatility could deter both domestic and international investors.

It’s also conceivable that we will see violent protests like those that occurred, during the Trump administration at state capitols in Arizona, Idaho, Michigan, and Oregon with armed protesters attempting to or successfully gaining access. And we may witness one or more large-scale riots like the one that occurred  in Washington, DC on January 6, 2021.

The possibility of continued domestic unrest is not simply conjecture. Numerous non-partisan organizations  (e.g., FBI and DHS Reports on Domestic Terrorism Threats, University of Maryland’s START findings, Pew Research Center, YouGov, etc. ) have conducted rigorous research pointing to this heightened risk.

The big question: Will law enforcement and military personnel be able to adequately respond to this kind of civil unrest and will they uphold their commitment to the Constitution if tested?

Given this state of affairs, what is the best course of action Americans who wish to live in a peaceful democracy take?

Although these suggestions may sound a little pollyannaish, Americans can take proactive steps to strengthen their communities, support democratic institutions, and foster personal and collective resilience. Here are seven strategies to consider:

  1. Engage in Informed, Active Citizenship

Prioritize high-quality information from reputable news sources. Check sources before sharing news or acting on it. Engage in democratic processes: show up to vote, volunteer as a poll worker, and participate in community dialogues. Attempt to have constructive conversations with people who hold opinions different than your own,  in order to help you to understand their perspectives and to reduce any misunderstandings you or they hold.

  1. Build Community Resilience

Strengthen connections within your local community. Build and maintain networks of support that can keep people connected, informed, and prepared, reducing vulnerability to radicalization. Prepare for possible temporary disruptions in public services. Stocking up on essentials (e.g., food, etc.) or knowing local emergency contacts is a way to feel more secure. Community-based initiatives—such as neighborhood watches or civic committees—can promote both safety and unity.

Focusing on community safety and nonviolence is another powerful step. Learning peaceful bystander intervention techniques (e.g., the 5 D’s of Bystander Intervention) and participating in community initiatives that promote nonviolence can help deter violence and defuse tense situations if they arise.

  1. Use Social Media Responsibly

In a climate where misinformation can escalate tensions, be mindful of what you consume and share on social media. Verify sources before reposting or reacting to content.

Promote civil discourse online whenever possible. (Don’t be a troll). Social media algorithms often amplify sensational or divisive content. By choosing to share posts that encourage unity, reason, and thoughtful analysis, individuals can contribute positively to the digital landscape.

  1. Support Nonpartisan, Community-Based Initiatives

Volunteering in activities that benefit the local community (e.g., helping out at food banks, homeless shelters,  cleaning up parks, etc.) can bring people with different political opinions together. Focusing on shared values and needs has the possibility of  reducing polarization within communities.

Supporting nonpartisan organizations (with donations of time and money) that prioritize election security, voter rights, and social unity—like the League of Women Voters—also strengthens democratic values across the spectrum.

  1. Promote Political and Social Accountability

Stay engaged with your political representatives. Don’t be afraid to contact elected officials about your concerns related to voting rights, security, and extremism. Don’t assume that you are being a pain. Citizens need to remind representives of their accountability to their constituents and encourage them to support policies that protect democratic principles and public safety.

Supporting transparent news media and civil rights groups (again with donations), like the ACLU, Center for Public Integrity, ProPublica, Pew Research Center,  or SPLC, is another way to maintain accountability. These organizations provide oversight on civil liberties, hate group activity, and government transparency, helping citizens stay informed with reliable information.

  1. Engage in Individual Resilience Practices

In high-stress times, physical and mental wellness is essential. Stress can cloud judgment and make people more susceptible to sickness, extreme rhetoric and do stupid things. It’s wise to take care of yourself by getting enough sleep, limiting alcohol or recreational drug use, and engaging in physical activity. Manage emotional reactions by taking a break from news media broadcasts and social media. Practice or increase the frequency with which you engage in relaxation techniques such as meditation, yoga, or walks in nature. Go to an art gallery or museum, engage in a hobby or pastime, like cooking.

  1. De-escalate Local Conflicts

Understanding and practicing de-escalation techniques can help when conflicts arise. Staying calm, actively listening, and keeping a safe distance from people who seem unhinged, and situations that seem out of control, may lessen unnecessary escalation. Familiarizing yourself with local de-escalation resources, like community mediators or violence interrupters can be useful. Contacting law enforcement should be reserved for clear threats or dangerous situations, as it can sometimes make matters worse.

Looking towards the Future

In these uncertain times,  these strategies and practices to bolster our communities, safeguard democratic principles, may be the best and only way to rationally navigate the unpredictable political landscape that has been thrust upon us.

Photo Credit:

Photographer John Rushing

Untitled (Police and protesters in Washington DC)

Eleven Reasons Why Criminal Justice Practitioners Should NOT Vote for Trump in 2024

In the United States, most law enforcement, corrections, probation, and parole officers typically have conservative beliefs and tend to vote for Republican political candidates.

Why? It’s mainly because of the party’s focus on law and order, support of criminal justice funding, and tougher crime policies.

But this upcoming presidential election (Tuesday November 5, 2024), most criminal justice practitioners should think twice about voting for Republican candidates and especially for former President Donald Trump.

Why is this the case?

1. During Trump’s presidency, federal law enforcement officers were deployed in response to protests and disturbances taking place in urban areas without local government consent, undermining local authority.

2. When he was in office, and particularly at the very end of his term, Trump issued pardons to individuals with close personal ties or political connections. This undermines legal accountability, and erodes the principle that justice should be blind and fair for all.

3. Both Trump’s rhetoric and policies have been criticized for marginalizing minority groups. Criminal justice professionals who prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion within their ranks, and towards the people they serve,  see this as detrimental to those efforts, leading to sanctioning racial profiling, and greater mistrust between law enforcement and diverse communities.

4. Trump repeatedly claims that he is above the law, and experienced several serious legal nonpartisan challenges during his presidency, and continues to be subject to criminal prosecution after his term in office expired.

5. The former president has been found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a civil case (Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump) and has now sustained 34 felony convictions in connection with hush money payments during his 2016 presidential campaign (People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump).

6. Trump has encouraged aggressive law enforcement tactics and has frequently supported the militarization of police forces in the United States. This does not align with criminal justice professionals who advocate community policing and de-escalation techniques to build trust with the people they serve.

7. There is significant evidence that during the Trump presidency that he attempted to undermine the independence of the Department of Justice (DOJ) by pressuring officials to pursue politically motivated investigations and intervene in cases involving his associates. This erodes the impartiality required in the criminal justice system.

8. Not only has Trump frequently and publicly criticized the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) accusing them all sorts of unproven actions. This has an overall effect of damaging the credibility of this important federal law enforcement institution and its ability to perform its duties in a nonpartisan manner.

9. In 2020, in the wake of the national protests against the death of African-American George Floyd, at the hands of Minneapolis Police officers, Trump encouraged a heavy handed response toward protesters. He was also dismissive of calls for police reform. Many criminal justice professionals who seek balanced reforms in policing find Trump’s stance lacking in addressing systemic issues within law enforcement.

10. Trump’s immigration policies and practices (e.g.,Sanctuary City Restrictions and Funding Ties, Increased Role of 287(g) Agreements, ICE Detainers and Hold Requests, Public Charge Rule, Enhanced Border Enforcement and Interior Checkpoints) placed additional burdens on local law enforcement officers and the criminal justice system, requiring them to act on policies that many see as inhumane or counterproductive.

11. Trump actively encouraged the January 6th Capitol riot, that led to the injury of approximately 140 law enforcement officers, the immediate death of one officer, and the suicide of four others. Trump’s (and fellow Republican politicians) misleading characterization of the protesters as peaceful undermines the reality of the violence and law enforcement casualties.

All in all, during his presidency and currently, Trump has eroded the fragile long-term trust between law enforcement, correctional, probation and parole officers and disadvantaged communities. Taken as a whole, Trumps actions (and MAGA nation) threaten the rule of law, negatively affect efforts to maintain and/or increase democratic accountability, and frustrate both current and  future of criminal justice reforms that are empirically proven to make a difference.

In short, not only will another Trump term be damaging to the nation as a whole, it will represent a step backward for criminal justice professionals who are committed to protecting the constitution, and evolving and reforming the fields of policing, corrections, probation and parole.

This is not a normal election, the solution is not to sit this election out, but to vote for Kamala Harris.

Photo credit:

Photographer: Diana Robinson
Title: NYPD Police Academy Graduation Ceremony at Madison Square Garden
(NYPD Police Academy Graduation Ceremony at Madison Square Garden on Monday, June 30, 2014)