Manhunts and the American Imagination

The recent shooting of Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, on the streets of New York City has reignited debates about the ethics of health insurance companies and their shortchanging of the American public. However, the dominant narrative in the news media seems to center on America’s enduring fascination with manhunts.

From Hollywood portrayals of lone sheriffs and posses, to television series on bounty hunters, to real-life searches for infamous criminals and suspects, manhunts capture public, media, law enforcement, and politicians attention.  

Cultural Fascination

Numerous classic films (e.g., Cool Hand Luke [1967]), television series (e.g., Manhunt), cable news networks, and other cultural industries frequently employ the manhunt trope. At the outset of these searches, media coverage is typically intense, exploring almost every conceivable angle (e.g., the shooter’s motives,  potential accomplices, the type of weapon/s used, etc.). These narratives often follow a predictable progression: escape, manhunt, and possible capture. Audiences are presented with images of the victim, their family or loved ones, witness interviews, and recurring press conferences featuring a Chief of Police or Public Information Officer.

If the person of interest is not captured quickly, the story’s prominence in the news often depends on the availability of competing stories. Sustaining coverage over an extended period can become challenging for the news media in such cases.

Contextual Variables in Manhunts

The success and intensity of these pursuits however, depend heavily on context. Factors such as What type of crime was committed?  How many people are killed and injured? Who was the target? What is the social status of the person? How well known is the person? Where does it take place? And how long does the crime take place? These kinds of baseline factors  precondition the response of other actors like the news media, law enforcement and politicians.   

Urban vs. Rural Challenges

One of the most significant factors in a criminal investigation is the location where the crime occurred and where the suspect is believed to have fled. This variable shapes other critical elements, such as the availability of eyewitnesses, the likelihood of cell phone footage, interactions with bystanders, and access to potentially useful CCTV footage.

The crime’s location is especially crucial in the immediate aftermath, typically within the first few hours. During this window, a suspect may have left the city or town quickly—potentially boarding a plane and fleeing out of state or even out of the country.

In urban environments, suspects often exploit the density and complexity of the setting. They can blend into crowds and use various transportation options—buses, subways, or rideshares—without drawing significant attention. The abundance of people and infrastructure in cities can work to the suspect’s advantage, making it harder for law enforcement to track their movements swiftly.

In contrast, crimes committed in rural or remote areas present different challenges to law enforcement. In smaller towns or sparsely populated regions, there are fewer witnesses, limited CCTV coverage, and fewer immediate leads for investigators. Once a suspect reaches a remote or wilderness location, tracking and apprehending them becomes even more difficult.

For example, Eric Rudolph, the Olympic Park and abortion clinic bomber, evaded capture for five years by fleeing to the Appalachian Mountains. His survival skills allowed him to live off the grid in a relatively isolated environment, complicating law enforcement efforts to locate him.

Technology & Resources

Another important facet of contemporary American manhunts is the power of technology. 

Innovations like facial recognition and drones have revolutionized tracking efforts in both urban and rural environments. Satellite technology, capable of identifying temperature variations, and night vision tools that detect heat signatures in darkness further enhance the ability to locate individuals in challenging conditions. While these advances in technology, have improved law enforcement’s capabilities, detection and capture in remote areas remain a significant challenge.

Equally critical are resource allocation and jurisdictional challenges, which often complicate these operations. Manhunts demand significant manpower and logistical support, frequently straining an agency’s budget. The sheer number of personnel required and the associated overtime costs can be overwhelming for law enforcement agencies.

Many law enforcement leaders view prolonged manhunts with apprehension—not due to accountability concerns or the need for frequent public updates, but primarily because of financial strain. Extended operations can wreak havoc on departmental budgets, with overtime expenses being a particularly pressing issue.

Rounding up 

Beyond the basics, manhunts also expose the public to different societal values, technological capabilities, and the allocation of resources. The fascination they inspire connects the public to themes of justice, pursuit, and spectacle. However, as our tools and expectations evolve, so too must our understanding of the logistical, ethical, and cultural complexities of this phenomenon.