In the United States, most law enforcement, corrections, probation, and parole officers typically have conservative beliefs and tend to vote for Republican political candidates.
Why? It’s mainly because of the party’s focus on law and order, support of criminal justice funding, and tougher crime policies.
But this upcoming presidential election (Tuesday November 5, 2024), most criminal justice practitioners should think twice about voting for Republican candidates and especially for former President Donald Trump.
2. When he was in office, and particularly at the very end of his term, Trump issued pardons to individuals with close personal ties or political connections. This undermines legal accountability, and erodes the principle that justice should be blind and fair for all.
3. Both Trump’s rhetoric and policies have been criticized for marginalizing minority groups. Criminal justice professionals who prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion within their ranks, and towards the people they serve, see this as detrimental to those efforts, leading to sanctioning racial profiling, and greater mistrust between law enforcement and diverse communities.
4. Trump repeatedly claims that he is above the law, and experienced several serious legal nonpartisan challenges during his presidency, and continues to be subject to criminal prosecution after his term in office expired.
5. The former president has been found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a civil case (Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump) and has now sustained 34 felony convictions in connection with hush money payments during his 2016 presidential campaign (People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump).
6. Trump has encouraged aggressive law enforcement tactics and has frequently supported the militarization of police forces in the United States. This does not align with criminal justice professionals who advocate community policing and de-escalation techniques to build trust with the people they serve.
7. There is significant evidence that during the Trump presidency that he attempted to undermine the independence of the Department of Justice (DOJ) by pressuring officials to pursue politically motivated investigations and intervene in cases involving his associates. This erodes the impartiality required in the criminal justice system.
8. Not only has Trump frequently and publicly criticized the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) accusing them all sorts of unproven actions. This has an overall effect of damaging the credibility of this important federal law enforcement institution and its ability to perform its duties in a nonpartisan manner.
9. In 2020, in the wake of the national protests against the death of African-American George Floyd, at the hands of Minneapolis Police officers, Trump encouraged a heavy handed response toward protesters. He was also dismissive of calls for police reform. Many criminal justice professionals who seek balanced reforms in policing find Trump’s stance lacking in addressing systemic issues within law enforcement.
10. Trump’s immigration policies and practices (e.g.,Sanctuary City Restrictions and Funding Ties, Increased Role of 287(g) Agreements, ICE Detainers and Hold Requests, Public Charge Rule, Enhanced Border Enforcement and Interior Checkpoints) placed additional burdens on local law enforcement officers and the criminal justice system, requiring them to act on policies that many see as inhumane or counterproductive.
11. Trump actively encouraged the January 6th Capitol riot, that led to the injury of approximately 140 law enforcement officers, the immediate death of one officer, and the suicide of four others. Trump’s (and fellow Republican politicians) misleading characterization of the protesters as peaceful undermines the reality of the violence and law enforcement casualties.
All in all, during his presidency and currently, Trump has eroded the fragile long-term trust between law enforcement, correctional, probation and parole officers and disadvantaged communities. Taken as a whole, Trumps actions (and MAGA nation) threaten the rule of law, negatively affect efforts to maintain and/or increase democratic accountability, and frustrate both current and future of criminal justice reforms that are empirically proven to make a difference.
In short, not only will another Trump term be damaging to the nation as a whole, it will represent a step backward for criminal justice professionals who are committed to protecting the constitution, and evolving and reforming the fields of policing, corrections, probation and parole.
Photographer: Diana Robinson
Title: NYPD Police Academy Graduation Ceremony at Madison Square Garden
(NYPD Police Academy Graduation Ceremony at Madison Square Garden on Monday, June 30, 2014)
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/14372129508_4ec2961339_o-scaled.jpg17042560Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2024-10-27 12:53:012024-10-27 12:53:01Eleven Reasons Why Criminal Justice Practitioners Should NOT Vote for Trump in 2024
Over the past two decades, interest in street food has grown.
Articles, books, podcasts, YouTube channels, and television shows have all celebrated the wide variety of dishes that fall under this type of cuisine.
When the term street food is mentioned, it typically conjures images of vendors cooking and serving local specialties in makeshift tents, kiosks, food carts, or other precarious structures in urban settings. In some cities, street food is seen as an integral part of urban and street culture.
Take almost any Saturday in New York City: one or more streets are blocked off, and numerous vendors line the streets, selling everything from Chinese dumplings, to Italian pizza, to Thai noodles to Mexican tacos. Depending on the weather and other competing factors, customers line up at these businesses to sample the diverse culinary options.
In many respects, street food has been, or continues to be part of the unique cultural and social fabric of many neighborhoods and cities around the world.
The Dilution of Street Food?
Historically, street food consisted of flavorful, traditional dishes prepared using local ingredients and cooking techniques. It was accessible both in terms of physical proximity and affordability, often quickly made and served to working people.
Street food was also connected to a meal’s origins, context, and who prepares it.
But today due to a confluence of factors, even some traditional high-end bricks and mortar restaurants, and fast-food chains operating in suburban shopping malls and airport terminals use the term street food in their description of the food they serve and the branding of their businesses.
In short, what was once a humble, localized type of food is now prepared, marketed, sold to, and eaten by consumers far removed from the streets.
One step further. The term street food now seems to be tossed around so carelessly that almost any food served in these settings is labeled street food, rendering the term and what it stands for increasingly meaningless.
Does this widened application of the expression undermine the authenticity of what street food truly is?
What Defines Street Food?
The current use of the term raises other important questions. For example, if so-called street food is cooked in one’s home, does it cease to be street food? Conversely, if a Michelin-starred restaurant temporarily serves one or more dishes at a street festival, does that make it street food?
Now consider these relatively recent developments:
Similarly food trucks, which have grown exponentially in many cities, further complicates the meaning of street food. Does their mobility and presence in urban settings automatically make them purveyors of street food, or are they merely rebranding the same fare served in brick-and-mortar restaurants?
These examples and the questions posed highlight the fluidity of the street food concept and seem to suggest that this type of cuisine is now less about the specific types of food that fall under the street food label, the context in which it is served, and the experience that the consumer has by eating it.
The Evolving Nature of Street Food
It’s important to recognize that the spread of so-called street food into new settings—such as malls, upscale restaurants, or even food trucks—is also indicative of its adaptability, creativity of the people who prepare it, and its influence.
The global popularity of street food has allowed vendors, chefs and cooks to experiment with traditional recipes, giving rise to fusion cuisines and new dining experiences that may attract new and diverse audiences.
Although this evolution may appear to dilute the original concept and meal, it also speaks to the dynamic nature of food culture in urban environments.
However, this expansion raises a tension: is street food evolving into something new, or is its identity being co-opted by commercial interests, reducing it to just another marketing gimmick?
A Lack of Consensus
The reluctance to definitively define street food isn’t just a cultural or linguistic debate; it extends to scholarly discussions in fields like urban studies, public health, nutrition, and food sciences.
Likely due to the complexities of global culinary traditions (think Bangkok or Mexico City), changing food consumption patterns, and the commercialization of what was once grassroots cuisine, many academics writing about street food and publishing in scholarly journals have been hesitant to lock down a clear definition.
The difficulty of applying a uniform definition to street food may be indicative of the vast differences in cultural, economic, and geographical contexts in which street food is prepared, sold and consumed.
Instead of focusing on rigid definitions and authenticity, perhaps we should also consider street food as a reflection of broader social and economic forces; ones that include the intertwined processes of migration, urbanization, and globalization.
Food for thought
Although street food was once tied to local, informal, and sometimes precarious street culture practices, in many parts of the world its evolved into a type of cuisine that is prepared, sold, and consumed by people far removed from the streets in which it might have been born.
This transformation has had an effect not just on what now constitutes street food, but changing food culture and consumer preferences.
Street food now embodies adaptability, ingenuity, and opportunity.
These changes should be understood every time you take a bite, slurp, swallow, enjoy, and perhaps digest your food.
Photo Credit
Photographer: Tore Bustad
Title: Street Food
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/49583773921_e42f6fe876_o.jpg16672500Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2024-10-20 12:55:142024-10-20 12:55:14The evolving nature of street food?
Last week, while mindlessly scrolling through TikTok, I stumbled upon a clip of singer, songwriter, and jazz bassist Adeline Michèle (aka Adi Oasis), performing a gig wearing a white hotel bathrobe and a towel turban around her head.
Undoubtedly, Adi’s decision to wear the bathrobe and head wrap on stage is one of the most unconventional fashion choices seen in modern musical performances.
Drilling deeper, one might wonder: why didn’t Adi, or one of her bandmates or friends, rush out and buy something more suitable for the occasion?
Also, why not stop at the bathrobe?
But Adi took her wardrobe a step further by sporting a head towel wrap, suggesting she had just stepped out of the shower, a choice that is reminiscent of classic advertising campaigns by Estée Lauder and L’Oréal, which have often featured models in white bathrobes with towel turbans, and iconic images of Marilyn Monroe, Kate Moss, Naomi Campbell, or even Audrey Hepburn in the classic movie, Breakfast at Tiffany’s.
What initially seemed like a pragmatic, but quirky and improvisational response to an airline screwup, could equally be a deliberate artistic statement, blending circumstance with performance and subtle commentary.
Performance Art, Gimmick, Distraction or Social Commentary?
To begin with, the image of Adi performing in a bathrobe and towel wrap creates an unusual, out-of-context, and—for some—arresting visual. It defies expectations, provoking viewers and listeners to ask questions.
This striking image grabs the audience’s attention, challenging conventional assumptions. It forces spectators to ask: Who is this woman playing the bass? What is the story behind this? Why the unconventional attire?
Is Adi pushing boundaries intentionally, or is it to shock viewers for the sake of spectacle? Could she be drawing on a tradition where everyday inconveniences are transformed into art?
If this is just an opportunistic gimmick, does it detract from the music, or does it enhance the overall experience by adding layers of meaning?
Could the white bathrobe and towel turban evolve into her signature style?
The key challenge is ensuring that this visual—the bathrobe, the towel, and its associated symbolism—does not overshadow the music itself.
If this look becomes a regular fixture at every performance, it risks becoming stale, losing the spontaneity and intrigue that made it memorable in the first place.
Will other musicians or creators begin to adopt this style in their own public performances?
As a form of social commentary, Adi’s attire could subtly critique the absurdities of modern travel, where lost luggage, delayed flights, and bizarre security protocols have become common enough to negatively impact musicians’ ability to engage in their craft and get to their gigs with a minimum of hassle.
Looking deeper, many iconic musicians—from Jimi Hendrix and Lady Gaga to Gene Simmons of KISS, Prince, David Bowie, and Mike Geier as Puddles Pity Party—have made bold visual choices in both their clothing and their performances, cementing their distinctive images.
Conclusion: Navigating the Balance
The challenge for many artists—musician or otherwise—is ensuring that extraneous things (like the choice of clothing they wear at their performances) doesn’t overshadow the merit of their work.
This not an easy task when they have to balance numerous competing obligations.
Adi’s bathrobe/turban wrap might have started as a one-time improvisation, but if it’s repeated or adopted by others, its originality will fade, becoming just another gimmick.
With so many competing pressures, it’s difficult for creators to remain dynamic and authentic.
Kudo’s to Adi for pulling it off.
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2024-10-13-at-12.31.38 AM.png1316752Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2024-10-13 14:32:092024-12-15 15:58:35Wrapping One’s Head Around Iconic Musical Performances
Eleven Reasons Why Criminal Justice Practitioners Should NOT Vote for Trump in 2024
/by Jeffrey Ian RossIn the United States, most law enforcement, corrections, probation, and parole officers typically have conservative beliefs and tend to vote for Republican political candidates.
Why? It’s mainly because of the party’s focus on law and order, support of criminal justice funding, and tougher crime policies.
But this upcoming presidential election (Tuesday November 5, 2024), most criminal justice practitioners should think twice about voting for Republican candidates and especially for former President Donald Trump.
Why is this the case?
1. During Trump’s presidency, federal law enforcement officers were deployed in response to protests and disturbances taking place in urban areas without local government consent, undermining local authority.
2. When he was in office, and particularly at the very end of his term, Trump issued pardons to individuals with close personal ties or political connections. This undermines legal accountability, and erodes the principle that justice should be blind and fair for all.
3. Both Trump’s rhetoric and policies have been criticized for marginalizing minority groups. Criminal justice professionals who prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion within their ranks, and towards the people they serve, see this as detrimental to those efforts, leading to sanctioning racial profiling, and greater mistrust between law enforcement and diverse communities.
4. Trump repeatedly claims that he is above the law, and experienced several serious legal nonpartisan challenges during his presidency, and continues to be subject to criminal prosecution after his term in office expired.
5. The former president has been found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a civil case (Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump) and has now sustained 34 felony convictions in connection with hush money payments during his 2016 presidential campaign (People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump).
6. Trump has encouraged aggressive law enforcement tactics and has frequently supported the militarization of police forces in the United States. This does not align with criminal justice professionals who advocate community policing and de-escalation techniques to build trust with the people they serve.
7. There is significant evidence that during the Trump presidency that he attempted to undermine the independence of the Department of Justice (DOJ) by pressuring officials to pursue politically motivated investigations and intervene in cases involving his associates. This erodes the impartiality required in the criminal justice system.
8. Not only has Trump frequently and publicly criticized the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) accusing them all sorts of unproven actions. This has an overall effect of damaging the credibility of this important federal law enforcement institution and its ability to perform its duties in a nonpartisan manner.
9. In 2020, in the wake of the national protests against the death of African-American George Floyd, at the hands of Minneapolis Police officers, Trump encouraged a heavy handed response toward protesters. He was also dismissive of calls for police reform. Many criminal justice professionals who seek balanced reforms in policing find Trump’s stance lacking in addressing systemic issues within law enforcement.
10. Trump’s immigration policies and practices (e.g.,Sanctuary City Restrictions and Funding Ties, Increased Role of 287(g) Agreements, ICE Detainers and Hold Requests, Public Charge Rule, Enhanced Border Enforcement and Interior Checkpoints) placed additional burdens on local law enforcement officers and the criminal justice system, requiring them to act on policies that many see as inhumane or counterproductive.
11. Trump actively encouraged the January 6th Capitol riot, that led to the injury of approximately 140 law enforcement officers, the immediate death of one officer, and the suicide of four others. Trump’s (and fellow Republican politicians) misleading characterization of the protesters as peaceful undermines the reality of the violence and law enforcement casualties.
All in all, during his presidency and currently, Trump has eroded the fragile long-term trust between law enforcement, correctional, probation and parole officers and disadvantaged communities. Taken as a whole, Trumps actions (and MAGA nation) threaten the rule of law, negatively affect efforts to maintain and/or increase democratic accountability, and frustrate both current and future of criminal justice reforms that are empirically proven to make a difference.
In short, not only will another Trump term be damaging to the nation as a whole, it will represent a step backward for criminal justice professionals who are committed to protecting the constitution, and evolving and reforming the fields of policing, corrections, probation and parole.
This is not a normal election, the solution is not to sit this election out, but to vote for Kamala Harris.
Photo credit:
Photographer: Diana Robinson
Title: NYPD Police Academy Graduation Ceremony at Madison Square Garden
(NYPD Police Academy Graduation Ceremony at Madison Square Garden on Monday, June 30, 2014)
The evolving nature of street food?
/by Jeffrey Ian RossOver the past two decades, interest in street food has grown.
Articles, books, podcasts, YouTube channels, and television shows have all celebrated the wide variety of dishes that fall under this type of cuisine.
When the term street food is mentioned, it typically conjures images of vendors cooking and serving local specialties in makeshift tents, kiosks, food carts, or other precarious structures in urban settings. In some cities, street food is seen as an integral part of urban and street culture.
Take almost any Saturday in New York City: one or more streets are blocked off, and numerous vendors line the streets, selling everything from Chinese dumplings, to Italian pizza, to Thai noodles to Mexican tacos. Depending on the weather and other competing factors, customers line up at these businesses to sample the diverse culinary options.
In many respects, street food has been, or continues to be part of the unique cultural and social fabric of many neighborhoods and cities around the world.
The Dilution of Street Food?
Historically, street food consisted of flavorful, traditional dishes prepared using local ingredients and cooking techniques. It was accessible both in terms of physical proximity and affordability, often quickly made and served to working people.
Street food was also connected to a meal’s origins, context, and who prepares it.
But today due to a confluence of factors, even some traditional high-end bricks and mortar restaurants, and fast-food chains operating in suburban shopping malls and airport terminals use the term street food in their description of the food they serve and the branding of their businesses.
In short, what was once a humble, localized type of food is now prepared, marketed, sold to, and eaten by consumers far removed from the streets.
One step further. The term street food now seems to be tossed around so carelessly that almost any food served in these settings is labeled street food, rendering the term and what it stands for increasingly meaningless.
Does this widened application of the expression undermine the authenticity of what street food truly is?
What Defines Street Food?
The current use of the term raises other important questions. For example, if so-called street food is cooked in one’s home, does it cease to be street food? Conversely, if a Michelin-starred restaurant temporarily serves one or more dishes at a street festival, does that make it street food?
Now consider these relatively recent developments:
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted restaurant owners to build makeshift outdoor dining shelters. Should food prepared in an indoor kitchen and served outside in these spaces now qualify as street food simply because it’s consumed in an open-air setting?
Similarly food trucks, which have grown exponentially in many cities, further complicates the meaning of street food. Does their mobility and presence in urban settings automatically make them purveyors of street food, or are they merely rebranding the same fare served in brick-and-mortar restaurants?
These examples and the questions posed highlight the fluidity of the street food concept and seem to suggest that this type of cuisine is now less about the specific types of food that fall under the street food label, the context in which it is served, and the experience that the consumer has by eating it.
The Evolving Nature of Street Food
It’s important to recognize that the spread of so-called street food into new settings—such as malls, upscale restaurants, or even food trucks—is also indicative of its adaptability, creativity of the people who prepare it, and its influence.
The global popularity of street food has allowed vendors, chefs and cooks to experiment with traditional recipes, giving rise to fusion cuisines and new dining experiences that may attract new and diverse audiences.
Although this evolution may appear to dilute the original concept and meal, it also speaks to the dynamic nature of food culture in urban environments.
However, this expansion raises a tension: is street food evolving into something new, or is its identity being co-opted by commercial interests, reducing it to just another marketing gimmick?
A Lack of Consensus
The reluctance to definitively define street food isn’t just a cultural or linguistic debate; it extends to scholarly discussions in fields like urban studies, public health, nutrition, and food sciences.
Likely due to the complexities of global culinary traditions (think Bangkok or Mexico City), changing food consumption patterns, and the commercialization of what was once grassroots cuisine, many academics writing about street food and publishing in scholarly journals have been hesitant to lock down a clear definition.
The difficulty of applying a uniform definition to street food may be indicative of the vast differences in cultural, economic, and geographical contexts in which street food is prepared, sold and consumed.
Instead of focusing on rigid definitions and authenticity, perhaps we should also consider street food as a reflection of broader social and economic forces; ones that include the intertwined processes of migration, urbanization, and globalization.
Food for thought
Although street food was once tied to local, informal, and sometimes precarious street culture practices, in many parts of the world its evolved into a type of cuisine that is prepared, sold, and consumed by people far removed from the streets in which it might have been born.
This transformation has had an effect not just on what now constitutes street food, but changing food culture and consumer preferences.
Street food now embodies adaptability, ingenuity, and opportunity.
These changes should be understood every time you take a bite, slurp, swallow, enjoy, and perhaps digest your food.
Photo Credit
Photographer: Tore Bustad
Title: Street Food
Wrapping One’s Head Around Iconic Musical Performances
/by Jeffrey Ian RossLast week, while mindlessly scrolling through TikTok, I stumbled upon a clip of singer, songwriter, and jazz bassist Adeline Michèle (aka Adi Oasis), performing a gig wearing a white hotel bathrobe and a towel turban around her head.
Just before taking the stage, she quickly told the person filming the video, and then the audience, that she was dressed this way because the airlines had lost her luggage.
Undoubtedly, Adi’s decision to wear the bathrobe and head wrap on stage is one of the most unconventional fashion choices seen in modern musical performances.
Drilling deeper, one might wonder: why didn’t Adi, or one of her bandmates or friends, rush out and buy something more suitable for the occasion?
Also, why not stop at the bathrobe?
But Adi took her wardrobe a step further by sporting a head towel wrap, suggesting she had just stepped out of the shower, a choice that is reminiscent of classic advertising campaigns by Estée Lauder and L’Oréal, which have often featured models in white bathrobes with towel turbans, and iconic images of Marilyn Monroe, Kate Moss, Naomi Campbell, or even Audrey Hepburn in the classic movie, Breakfast at Tiffany’s.
What initially seemed like a pragmatic, but quirky and improvisational response to an airline screwup, could equally be a deliberate artistic statement, blending circumstance with performance and subtle commentary.
Performance Art, Gimmick, Distraction or Social Commentary?
To begin with, the image of Adi performing in a bathrobe and towel wrap creates an unusual, out-of-context, and—for some—arresting visual. It defies expectations, provoking viewers and listeners to ask questions.
This striking image grabs the audience’s attention, challenging conventional assumptions. It forces spectators to ask: Who is this woman playing the bass? What is the story behind this? Why the unconventional attire?
Is Adi pushing boundaries intentionally, or is it to shock viewers for the sake of spectacle? Could she be drawing on a tradition where everyday inconveniences are transformed into art?
If this is just an opportunistic gimmick, does it detract from the music, or does it enhance the overall experience by adding layers of meaning?
Could the white bathrobe and towel turban evolve into her signature style?
The key challenge is ensuring that this visual—the bathrobe, the towel, and its associated symbolism—does not overshadow the music itself.
If this look becomes a regular fixture at every performance, it risks becoming stale, losing the spontaneity and intrigue that made it memorable in the first place.
Will other musicians or creators begin to adopt this style in their own public performances?
As a form of social commentary, Adi’s attire could subtly critique the absurdities of modern travel, where lost luggage, delayed flights, and bizarre security protocols have become common enough to negatively impact musicians’ ability to engage in their craft and get to their gigs with a minimum of hassle.
In a separate post, Adi mentioned how the airline she took to get to the performance prevented her from bringing her bass guitar on the plane (and then ended up losing her luggage). This isn’t a new problem; many musicians have voiced frustration about airlines restricting or damaging their instruments.
Looking deeper, many iconic musicians—from Jimi Hendrix and Lady Gaga to Gene Simmons of KISS, Prince, David Bowie, and Mike Geier as Puddles Pity Party—have made bold visual choices in both their clothing and their performances, cementing their distinctive images.
Conclusion: Navigating the Balance
The challenge for many artists—musician or otherwise—is ensuring that extraneous things (like the choice of clothing they wear at their performances) doesn’t overshadow the merit of their work.
This not an easy task when they have to balance numerous competing obligations.
Adi’s bathrobe/turban wrap might have started as a one-time improvisation, but if it’s repeated or adopted by others, its originality will fade, becoming just another gimmick.
With so many competing pressures, it’s difficult for creators to remain dynamic and authentic.
Kudo’s to Adi for pulling it off.