One of my favorite songs is Gil Scott-Heron’s Winter in America. Released in 1974, in the wake of the Vietnam War and as the Watergate scandal unraveled the Nixon presidency, it captured a national mood of disillusionment and political fatigue. The Civil Rights Movement had stalled, trust in government was crumbling, and the promise of a just America felt increasingly distant.
Heron’s lyrics are both powerful and depressing. “Nobody’s fighting ‘cause nobody knows what to save,” he sings, summing up a moment when America seemed not just broken, but lost. The song wasn’t just a critique of failed expectations and political leadership; it was a lament for a country adrift, unsure of its future.
And here we are, nearly fifty years later, and “things still seem the same.”
Since the release of Winter in America, the U.S. has cycled through administrations that offered fleeting hope or deepened despair. For many, the presidencies of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were moments of cautious optimism. But they were followed by less empathetic presidencies (i.e., Reagan, the Bushes, and Trump) and more turbulent times: endless wars that America participated in, economic volatility, rising inequality, mass incarceration, and political divisions so deep they feel unbridgeable. Now, in Trump’s second term, despair is settling back in.
A few months ago, while driving through the streets of Washington, DC, I saw deflated Santas slumped over on lawns, months after Christmas, long past when they should have been put away. I couldn’t help but feel like they symbolized something deeper. It’s as if the country has collapsed under political, emotional, and existential exhaustion. You can almost hear people saying, not just “What the hell are we gonna do?” but “Why the fuck bother?”
Winter in America was written in a different time, but its message still resonates. Although new methods of communication, especially social media, have entered the scene, they often amplify the same confusion and discontent that Heron captured decades ago. The platforms may be new, but the sense of alienation and polarization they foster remains the same, if not more intense than ever.
Meanwhile, the institutions we’re supposed to trust (Congress, the Supreme Court, police, etc. ) often seem more interested in protecting power than serving the average American. Heron sings “The Constitution… Struggled, but it died in vain.”
The wealth gap has only widened. The streets of American cities echo with homelessness, frustration, and fear. (Visible reminders that many of today’s politicians like to distract us with).
We’ve been here before. In the 1970s, New York City and Detroit teetered on the edge of bankruptcy, and urban decay was blatantly visible. After 9/11, and again during the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw the same patterns: fear, isolation, blaming the powerless, and uncertainty about what the future holds.
But this time, the darkness that Heron sings about feels heavier. Perhaps it’s because we’ve already lived through so much. Perhaps because the contrast with the hope that came before it feels so sharp. Maybe because the myths of justice for all, religious freedom, the land of opportunity, etc., no longer hold.
Winter in America remains relevant not just because it predicted cycles of decline but also because it reflected on something deeper—the emotional toll of living in a country that promises so much but delivers so little to so many.
It continues when we decide to confront the myths upon which the country was built, attempt to educate those who believe them to be true, collectively work for a just society, and elect leaders at the local, state, and federal level who truly care about the welfare of others and who don’t use their positions to line their own pockets.
Photo Credit
Title: Gil Scott-Heron in Locorotondo, Italy, July 2010
Photographer: Michele Giaovelli
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/Screen-Shot-2025-05-17-at-11.08.29-PM.png397597Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2025-05-18 03:33:492025-05-18 03:33:49The Continuing Relevance of Gil Scott-Heron’s “Winter in America”
Although spoken and written words matter, provocative visuals often capture public attention more quickly and viscerally.
Admittedly, some visual content, such as television programs and Hollywood films, requires significant resources to produce. However, other forms, like graffiti, street art, and memes, are far more affordable.
Meanwhile, one often overlooked, enduring, and accessible form of low-cost visual resistance is the protest sign or placard.
Over the past three decades, protest signage has evolved into a more visually expressive and sophisticated medium of communication.
Increasingly, protest signs have become both physical objects and digital artifacts. In many respects, they are one of the most agile and immediate tools of grassroots communication. From the Women’s March to Black Lives Matter demonstrations to global climate strikes, hand-held placards have shaped the visual lexicon of 21st-century resistance.
No longer limited to quickly scrawled slogans on cardboard, today’s signs often incorporate photography, collage, stylized typography, and digital illustration. This transformation reflects not only changing aesthetic sensibilities but also broader technological and cultural shifts.
Individuals who want to create a relatively engaging placard no longer need to visit a print shop. The tools required to produce compelling visuals are now widely accessible. Design software like Photoshop, mobile apps, and AI-based image tools allows almost anyone with a laptop or smartphone to create professional-looking graphics. Affordable home printers and easy online purchase of poster board, stencils, and other materials have removed many logistical hurdles in creating compelling protest placards.
Yet despite the sophistication of these materials, most protest signs are inherently ephemeral. They are discarded, destroyed, or lost shortly after the event. In contrast, politically charged murals, graffiti, and street art may linger for weeks or years in the public realm. As with graffiti and street art, unless we are physically present at a protest, we depend on photographers, journalists, or participants to capture and circulate these images, often through social media.
Another aspect should be considered. It’s fair to say that, like some graffiti writers and street artists, protestors may now design their signs to capture the attention of people at the protest and a social media audience beyond. Thus, the line between political messaging and performance can be thin, raising questions about authenticity and the commodification of dissent.
In the end, thanks to accessible technology and widespread digital platforms, activists now possess the tools to create protest signs that, though materially fragile, can achieve enduring cultural visibility. A well-designed placard may disappear after the march, but its image can live on, influencing discourse far beyond the street.
Photo Credit
Title: Anti-Trump Protest Sign
Photographer: Jeffrey Ian Ross
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_6901-scaled.jpg25601920Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2025-05-11 13:04:422025-05-11 13:38:42The Visual Evolution of Digital Age Protest Signs
Periodically, I try to identify my “top ten” books, food, movies, music, travel destinations, etc. In general, this exercise forces me to learn about my preferences by prompting me to consider not just what I like, but why I like it.
In doing so, I engage more deeply with genres, styles, and categories I might otherwise overlook—and I gain clarity in articulating what resonates with me and why.
Take, for example, blues music. I might begin by asking myself: Which style of blues do I prefer (e.g., Chicago, Delta, Texas, etc.)? If I have the time and inclination, I can drill down further, identifying which musicians within that category I enjoy most and why. To do this, I listen to what I consider to be a representative sample of their work and then determine which songs resonate with me and what specifically draws me to them.
This process does not have to start at the genre level and work towards the musician or song. It can easily begin with the song and move towards the genre. For example, why does Maurice Brown’s “The Mood” or Stanley Clarke’s “East River Drive” appeal to me? Once I pose this question then I feel compelled to dig below the surface.
Sometimes, this exercise can feel overwhelming. In such cases, I might narrow the list to a top five or even three. The important point is to select a manageable set and then clearly explain my choices.
Focusing on personal preferences and articulating the reasons behind them encourages exploration and assists me to sharpen my critical thinking. It also provides a foundation for strategic planning, helping me better choose future projects, adventures, and experiments. By understanding what engages me the most, I can move forward with greater clarity and purpose.
Photo Credit:
Photographer: Tom Page
Title: 2012 Paralympics
https://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/8276119032_3c52fb9857_c.jpg533799Jeffrey Ian Rosshttps://jeffreyianross.com/wp-content/uploads/jeffrey-ian-ross-logo-04.pngJeffrey Ian Ross2025-05-04 04:27:442025-05-04 04:27:44Rank Ordering to Clarify What Matters Most
The Continuing Relevance of Gil Scott-Heron’s “Winter in America”
/by Jeffrey Ian RossOne of my favorite songs is Gil Scott-Heron’s Winter in America. Released in 1974, in the wake of the Vietnam War and as the Watergate scandal unraveled the Nixon presidency, it captured a national mood of disillusionment and political fatigue. The Civil Rights Movement had stalled, trust in government was crumbling, and the promise of a just America felt increasingly distant.
Heron’s lyrics are both powerful and depressing. “Nobody’s fighting ‘cause nobody knows what to save,” he sings, summing up a moment when America seemed not just broken, but lost. The song wasn’t just a critique of failed expectations and political leadership; it was a lament for a country adrift, unsure of its future.
And here we are, nearly fifty years later, and “things still seem the same.”
Since the release of Winter in America, the U.S. has cycled through administrations that offered fleeting hope or deepened despair. For many, the presidencies of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were moments of cautious optimism. But they were followed by less empathetic presidencies (i.e., Reagan, the Bushes, and Trump) and more turbulent times: endless wars that America participated in, economic volatility, rising inequality, mass incarceration, and political divisions so deep they feel unbridgeable. Now, in Trump’s second term, despair is settling back in.
A few months ago, while driving through the streets of Washington, DC, I saw deflated Santas slumped over on lawns, months after Christmas, long past when they should have been put away. I couldn’t help but feel like they symbolized something deeper. It’s as if the country has collapsed under political, emotional, and existential exhaustion. You can almost hear people saying, not just “What the hell are we gonna do?” but “Why the fuck bother?”
Winter in America was written in a different time, but its message still resonates. Although new methods of communication, especially social media, have entered the scene, they often amplify the same confusion and discontent that Heron captured decades ago. The platforms may be new, but the sense of alienation and polarization they foster remains the same, if not more intense than ever.
Meanwhile, the institutions we’re supposed to trust (Congress, the Supreme Court, police, etc. ) often seem more interested in protecting power than serving the average American. Heron sings “The Constitution… Struggled, but it died in vain.”
The wealth gap has only widened. The streets of American cities echo with homelessness, frustration, and fear. (Visible reminders that many of today’s politicians like to distract us with).
We’ve been here before. In the 1970s, New York City and Detroit teetered on the edge of bankruptcy, and urban decay was blatantly visible. After 9/11, and again during the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw the same patterns: fear, isolation, blaming the powerless, and uncertainty about what the future holds.
But this time, the darkness that Heron sings about feels heavier. Perhaps it’s because we’ve already lived through so much. Perhaps because the contrast with the hope that came before it feels so sharp. Maybe because the myths of justice for all, religious freedom, the land of opportunity, etc., no longer hold.
Winter in America remains relevant not just because it predicted cycles of decline but also because it reflected on something deeper—the emotional toll of living in a country that promises so much but delivers so little to so many.
That kind of winter doesn’t end with a change in the weather. It starts with a critical self-examination, like the one Albert Hirschman discussed in his book, Exit, Voice, Loyalty.
It continues when we decide to confront the myths upon which the country was built, attempt to educate those who believe them to be true, collectively work for a just society, and elect leaders at the local, state, and federal level who truly care about the welfare of others and who don’t use their positions to line their own pockets.
Photo Credit
Title: Gil Scott-Heron in Locorotondo, Italy, July 2010
Photographer: Michele Giaovelli
The Visual Evolution of Digital Age Protest Signs
/by Jeffrey Ian RossPolitical expression takes many forms.
Although spoken and written words matter, provocative visuals often capture public attention more quickly and viscerally.
Admittedly, some visual content, such as television programs and Hollywood films, requires significant resources to produce. However, other forms, like graffiti, street art, and memes, are far more affordable.
Meanwhile, one often overlooked, enduring, and accessible form of low-cost visual resistance is the protest sign or placard.
Over the past three decades, protest signage has evolved into a more visually expressive and sophisticated medium of communication.
Increasingly, protest signs have become both physical objects and digital artifacts. In many respects, they are one of the most agile and immediate tools of grassroots communication. From the Women’s March to Black Lives Matter demonstrations to global climate strikes, hand-held placards have shaped the visual lexicon of 21st-century resistance.
No longer limited to quickly scrawled slogans on cardboard, today’s signs often incorporate photography, collage, stylized typography, and digital illustration. This transformation reflects not only changing aesthetic sensibilities but also broader technological and cultural shifts.
Individuals who want to create a relatively engaging placard no longer need to visit a print shop. The tools required to produce compelling visuals are now widely accessible. Design software like Photoshop, mobile apps, and AI-based image tools allows almost anyone with a laptop or smartphone to create professional-looking graphics. Affordable home printers and easy online purchase of poster board, stencils, and other materials have removed many logistical hurdles in creating compelling protest placards.
Yet despite the sophistication of these materials, most protest signs are inherently ephemeral. They are discarded, destroyed, or lost shortly after the event. In contrast, politically charged murals, graffiti, and street art may linger for weeks or years in the public realm. As with graffiti and street art, unless we are physically present at a protest, we depend on photographers, journalists, or participants to capture and circulate these images, often through social media.
Another aspect should be considered. It’s fair to say that, like some graffiti writers and street artists, protestors may now design their signs to capture the attention of people at the protest and a social media audience beyond. Thus, the line between political messaging and performance can be thin, raising questions about authenticity and the commodification of dissent.
In the end, thanks to accessible technology and widespread digital platforms, activists now possess the tools to create protest signs that, though materially fragile, can achieve enduring cultural visibility. A well-designed placard may disappear after the march, but its image can live on, influencing discourse far beyond the street.
Photo Credit
Title: Anti-Trump Protest Sign
Photographer: Jeffrey Ian Ross
Rank Ordering to Clarify What Matters Most
/by Jeffrey Ian RossPeriodically, I try to identify my “top ten” books, food, movies, music, travel destinations, etc. In general, this exercise forces me to learn about my preferences by prompting me to consider not just what I like, but why I like it.
In doing so, I engage more deeply with genres, styles, and categories I might otherwise overlook—and I gain clarity in articulating what resonates with me and why.
Take, for example, blues music. I might begin by asking myself: Which style of blues do I prefer (e.g., Chicago, Delta, Texas, etc.)? If I have the time and inclination, I can drill down further, identifying which musicians within that category I enjoy most and why. To do this, I listen to what I consider to be a representative sample of their work and then determine which songs resonate with me and what specifically draws me to them.
This process does not have to start at the genre level and work towards the musician or song. It can easily begin with the song and move towards the genre. For example, why does Maurice Brown’s “The Mood” or Stanley Clarke’s “East River Drive” appeal to me? Once I pose this question then I feel compelled to dig below the surface.
Sometimes, this exercise can feel overwhelming. In such cases, I might narrow the list to a top five or even three. The important point is to select a manageable set and then clearly explain my choices.
Focusing on personal preferences and articulating the reasons behind them encourages exploration and assists me to sharpen my critical thinking. It also provides a foundation for strategic planning, helping me better choose future projects, adventures, and experiments. By understanding what engages me the most, I can move forward with greater clarity and purpose.
Photo Credit:
Photographer: Tom Page
Title: 2012 Paralympics