Blog

Undergrads need to know the difference between expressing facts versus opinions

University instructors and students usually have contrasting expectations of each other.

One of the most dominant concerns the respective roles and differences between facts versus opinions.

Some students, (and sometimes instructors and administrators too) assume that university instruction should primarily be the transmission of facts and ideas, and dislike it when their instructors offer their own opinions.

This approach to instruction and learning, however, is problematic. Why?

To begin with many students don’t know the difference between facts and opinions and the relationship between the two. Some may even assume that instructors sole purpose is to assist students understand the content of the textbooks or reading materials that that are assigned in the class.

Getting an education that places primacy of knowing facts versus being able to understand, develop, and argue against opinions assumes that life is simple and that there are always correct answers to complex problems and situations.

But the world, more specifically the professions in which a university education is typically required is complex. That is why argumentation, logic, critical thinking, and opinions will almost always be valued.

That being said, facts should be understood as starting points in any discussion or debate, but they don’t win the day. Facts may be wrong (e.g., taken from inappropriate sources) and/or misapplied in particular situations. Also just because an instructor has opinions (which they should) doesn’t mean that students can’t or shouldn’t question them. (Likewise there are better and worse opinions and not everyone’s and every organizations’ opinions are of equal value).

On the other hand, there is significant pedagogical value when students question the instructors perspective and vice versa. This is how we learn and should learn.

Photo Credit

bellmon
opinión

Why do some cities appear to have more graffiti and street art than others?

Cities and urban locations vary not only on their size, topography, the people who live, work, and visit there, the kinds of businesses they support, but on the types of structures that are built to enable the activities that occur in these locales.

Most cities and urban locations also have considerable diversity in the types of neighborhoods that develop within their confines, including ones that are more residential in nature, and those that have more commercial buildings where people work, shop, or ones in which they learn (i.e., schools) or worship.

This diversity is frequently reflected in the visual landscape, including the types of structures that are built and their condition, and the amount, type and quality of the green space, like parks, ravines, etc.

That being said, frequently people who travel or vacation to or in other cities note the abundance of graffiti and street art in these locations. Although these individuals may not be able to distinguish among different types of graffiti, street art, murals, and public art, this visual information typically impacts visitors and tourists.

Although the question of whether a city (or indeed a neighborhood) has more graffiti, etc. than others) is open for empirical evaluation, and doing so would require an enormous amount of resources, here are some thoughts about why this may occur.

Despite being frequently beat up by critical criminologists, the Routine Activities Theory, though a relatively simple explanation, might provide some initial insights. According to this explanation, the presence of graffiti and street art might be facilitated by a considerable number of suitable targets, no or few capable guardians, and highly motivated people.

With respect to suitable targets. Cities (or neighborhoods) where there are lots of abandoned buildings (from houses that are speculated on, to factories and warehouses), train yards, and parking lots, may be ripe for graffiti writers and street artists to do their thing. Additionally, in these areas there may also be certain norms about both private and public property. In other words it may be okay to spray graffiti on a surface that is slated for demolition, new siding, or a new paint job. On the other hand, if the structure is a house of worship then it may be deemed off limits as are brick surfaces of a building, whereas the wooden doors may be up for grabs as they can be easily painted over are.

Closely related to this issue is how a city’s Department of Public Works or Business Improvement District/s engage in graffiti/street art abatement. For example, they may clean or buff graffiti/street art on an irregular basis. Inevitably this can set the tone for the abundance of graffiti/street art or graffiti writers/street artists to seek alternative surfaces. Along with lots of suitable targets, a city or neighborhood may provide better access to materials, like paint, markers, etc. used by writers and artists in their applications. Additional factors may be proximity to copy shops, printers etc. where street artists can print their own stickers, wheat pastes etc. at a fraction of the cost than doing this on a home printer. As for the many types of street art, this may in fact be actively encouraged by an arts district.

In terms of capable guardians, a neighborhood may not have “enough” motivated private security guards, municipal police officers, or concerned neighbors to respond to graffiti writers and street artists. This may be because the public and private or public security officers are busy doing more important things, don’t really care, or the citizens in that neighborhood are apathetic, or have communicated to public and private safety officials that they want them to focus on more important challenges.

Finally, a city or neighborhood may have an active graffiti and street art subculture or scene. People who are part of this collectivity typically know each other, hang together, and collaborate (or sometimes compete) with each on graffiti/street art. All told they are part of the street culture that develops in different parts of an urban location.

Every relatively large city has graffiti and street art. Because of the ephemeral nature of graffiti and street art, the amount and types of this work changes and can be more or less than that which appears in similar sized urban locations. Understanding the subtle dynamics is more complicated to understand, but worth knowing about if one is to take this modern form of visual communication seriously.

Photo: Robert Wallace
Athens Graffiti

Whose vacation is it anyways?

Summer is here. It’s warm outside, many people think that COVID-19 has been beat, have cabin fever, disposable income, can take time off work, and want to travel and take a vacation.

After the decision to travel has been made, then it’s time to make numerous choices about where to go, when to go, what to see, how long, how to get there, and where to stay and eat.

And if you are traveling with another person (i.e., a friend or family) then there are always compromises that need to be made.

Some of these decisions should probably be made before leaving your dwelling whereas others can be made while on the road or at the spur of the moment.

These are perennial questions that many people in this particular situation ask but for some strange reason don’t really think through. For example, let’s say you want to visit Paris, France. Many tourists who go there often feel obligated to visit the popular attractions like the Eiffel Tower, the Louvre, the Musée d’Orsay, various memorials, and possibly neighborhoods like Marais and the Latin Quarter.

But visiting these destinations can be unnecessarily challenging experiences. The lines to get into popular museums and galleries are frequently long, the popular venues and neighborhoods are crowded, the signs may be confusing, and once inside the attractions it’s a less than ideal setting to glean the information that is presented. In short, the average visitor ends up becoming overwhelmed and exhausted.

Traveling and vacationing can be especially challenging for women, visible racial and ethnic minorities, senior citizens, the disabled, and people traveling with infants, small children, and animals.

The more important question tourists and vacationers should probably ask is why should you subject yourself to these kinds of experiences? If it’s because that’s what everybody does when they go to Paris (or some other popular destination), or to post photos on your Instagram, or to show your friends that you are cosmopolitan, then I’d argue that this is a big waste of your time and money.

But so many people’s approach to travel and vacationing is simply just that.

They come home from vacation exhausted and frustrated and vow to do it differently next time.

Most people are poor travelers. This may be because they do it so infrequently and thus they are not experienced, don’t really know where to visit, what to bring along, and where to stay and eat.

So how can this frequently negative experience be minimized?

At the core of traveling is doing some thoughtful planning to avoid a boatload of regret during and once you return home. Ask yourself tough but thoughtful questions, rather than leaving it up to someone else (like a tour operator) or assume that you’ll “figure it out once you get there.”

Determine beforehand exactly what you want to accomplish by going on vacation and if the possible destinations that are on your short list will enable you to achieve this. Make multiple lists asking yourself what you want to visit and why.

Talk to people who have recently visited the location that you want to go to. Ask them what they liked and disliked the most. If finding appropriate people to talk to is too difficult then visit travel web sites like www.tripadvisor.com or www.yelp.com to get a sense of where people visit, what they see and experience, why they go to those locations, and how. This task should not be too difficult, but if you want to maximize your enjoyment start by asking questions now rather than later.

Photo Credit:

Fredrik Rubensson
Louvres