Blog

A police union’s endorsement of Trump is not a happy one

Last week during a campaign event, held in Grand Rapids, Michigan, after former President Donald Trump’s xenophobic rant, James Tignanelli, head of the Police Officers Association of Michigan (representing 10,000 members) announced that the organization which he leads, was endorsing the former President’s bid for reelection.

Historically this kind of support, should come as no surprise. Police officer associations, organizations and unions (not all the same) have endorsed candidates (typically Republican) running for all levels of political office. Moreover, in March 2024, the International Union of Police Associations (with its 10,000 members) and the Florida Police Benevolent Association (FBPA), Florida’s largest law enforcement union also gave their blessing to Trump’s reelection bid.

That being said, although the rank and file law enforcement officers can vote their own consciences, current police union endorsements appear unusual, if not contradictory, when one is to consider the events of January 6, 2021, when Trump encouraged a large unruly mob to storm the capitol.

Not only did the public see televised images of insurrectionists breaking into the capitol, but beating and injuring Capitol Police and other law enforcement officers who were sent in to end the siege. In the end there were numerous injuries and a handful of deaths, and several criminal indictments, and convictions of insurrectionists.

From their role as strike breakers to policing protests, police (more specifically their unions and associations) have always been a conservative lot. But supporting Trump in this manner is unusual in this current context.

This begs a number of questions.

Although the endorsement was criticized by a handful of Trump critics, and raised eyebrows in selected quarters of social media, the largest labor organizations representing the interests of police in the United States, such as the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) (355,000 members); and National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO) (241,000 members) were silent. Maybe they are waiting to see if Trump is convicted of criminal charges, but given their 2020 endorsements of Trump, it’s quite likely that they will endorse Trump in 2024.

Thus, beyond the obvious, (i.e., Trumps approach to law and order, and the border crisis) why are the police officer unions, associations and organizations enabling Trump?

It might be that the police unions, and their heads want more national attention and by staking out a controversial position like supporting Trump they believe that it’s a good way to go about accomplishing this.

Alternatively, they don’t know any better. They may be low information voters. And thus, it they have taken a position regardless of the information that is presented to them.

More realistically, there is a general inability among many of Trump’s supporters to see or recognize contradictions in their actions and beliefs. Often they seem to be comfortable with compartmentalizing beliefs that to other people would seem to be contradictory. They may also be suffering like many of us from cognitive inflexibility.

So, how might we respond to police unions supporting Trump?

It’s tempting to put both hands in the air and say that you give up.

However, those of us who work in or with the criminal justice profession—be it as practitioners, instructors, or scholars—possess a unique vantage point that allows us to wield some influence.

Many of our students are former, current, or aspiring law enforcement officers, thus offering us a direct avenue for engagement. By actively confronting the contradictions within their beliefs, we might be able to provide them a deeper understanding. This is not easy and will involve regular and consistent dialogue and mentorship, where we attempt to professionally dissect their perspectives and challenge their ingrained notions. Through these efforts, we might be able to foster critical introspection, not only affecting their political beliefs, but with this knowledge, they may also be able to influence their co-workers so that they too make more critical decisions about their political future.

Photo Credit:

Photographer: Mostafa Bassim

Title: Police clash with a mob of Trump supporters who breached security and stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021.

Inner city hospital emergency department waiting rooms as places of power and contestation

Similar to bustling transportation hubs, concert venues, and sporting arenas, the waiting rooms of large inner-city hospital emergency departments in the United States, and many other advanced industrialized countries, can be chaotic and challenging environments to navigate. More specifically, beyond their role as places of healing, these urban public spaces are environments where power dynamics and status roles are constantly negotiated and contested.

Description of the Situation

Stepping into a hospital emergency department waiting room reveals a scene of varied activity: security personnel and possibly police stationed at the entrance, receptionists and nurses managing intake, and patients (and the people who may accompany them) anxiously awaiting their turn for care. Signs, doors, and counters appear to be  everywhere.

Although many staff members exhibit care and compassion, others, often because of  burnout and physical and emotional fatigue from shift work,  and overly demanding and sometimes rude patrons, and sometimes violence by actual and prospective patients, may appear jaded, overly bureaucratic or even hostile. Meanwhile patients may feel processed, and frequently encounter directives like “Please take your turn” and “Please sit down until your name is called,” amidst an atmosphere of impatience and tension.

Both emergency department workers and patients, along with their relatives or friends, may experience a range of emotions, finding the experience frustrating, challenging, and at times, unexpectedly interesting. However, the environment can also evoke feelings of depression and anxiety.

In short, emergency departments operate on the principle of triage, prioritizing those with life-threatening conditions while managing resources to address the needs of all patients. Influenced by economic constraints, this leads to a rationing of care. Patients arrive via emergency medical services, police transport, or as walk-ins, representing a diverse spectrum of demographics and health conditions. Among them are the poor, homeless, elderly, mentally ill, victims of street and domestic violence, and substance-dependent individuals, often with complex and urgent medical and psychiatric needs.

Significance of the Issue

In societies where access to healthcare is rationed, preventative care remains elusive for many urban dwellers, inner-city emergency departments serve as the last resort for those in need. The waiting rooms are often full with lower socioeconomic individuals who face barriers to accessing timely and adequate healthcare, exacerbating health disparities. The lack of access to primary care providers contributes to the overutilization of emergency services, particularly by marginalized populations, including the homeless. Class dynamics also come into play, with privileged individuals who visit the ER sometimes expecting preferential treatment based on their social status.

The ebb and flow of patients in emergency departments vary with the time of day and season, reflecting seasonal health trends, climatic conditions, and local demographics. People who show up in the emergency rooms sometimes may do so with open sores, poor hygiene, coughing and hacking. Within the waiting room, tensions simmer as individuals vie for attention, with intake nurses assuming the roles of mediators and gatekeepers.

Proposed Solutions

Addressing the challenges inherent in inner-city emergency department waiting rooms requires multifaceted strategies. These include, but are not limited to:

Enhanced Patient Experience: Introducing entertainment options such as TVs and magazines can alleviate boredom and reduce tension. Clear communication about wait times and procedures can manage expectations and reduce anxiety.

Support for Staff: Investing in training programs and support services can equip staff with the necessary skills to navigate challenging interactions and mitigate burnout.

Community Outreach: Educating the community about the appropriate use of emergency departments and promoting access to primary care can reduce reliance on emergency services for non-urgent needs.

Streamlined Processes: Optimizing triage and intake procedures can minimize wait times and ensure timely access to care for those with urgent medical needs.

Addressing Healthcare Inequities: Advocating for policies aimed at improving access to primary care and addressing social determinants of health is crucial to reducing disparities in emergency department utilization.

Collaborative Partnerships: Engaging with local government agencies and community organizations to develop holistic approaches to healthcare delivery can address underlying systemic issues contributing to frequent emergency department visits.

In conclusion, inner-city emergency department waiting rooms serve as microcosms of broader societal inequities in healthcare access. By one or more of these suggestions, we might be able to create more equitable and compassionate healthcare systems for all individuals, regardless of socioeconomic status and reduce the kinds of challenges that are manifest in places like emergency rooms of inner city hospitals.

 

Photo Credit:

Photographer: Micheal

Title: Emergency Room

Navigating Authenticity and Curation in a Digital Age

We live in a rapidly changing world, where we are increasingly exposed to both AI-generated content and human manipulated images/documents (i.e., photoshopping, deep fakes, airbrushed photos, etc.), as well as curated social media feeds and carefully crafted personal brands. Meanwhile individuals are constantly navigating this complex landscape in search of genuine experiences, spaces, and relationships. Ultimately this phenomenon has reinforced the tension between authenticity and curation. 

These processes come at a cost, that typically involves a series of tradeoffs.

Consider an individual who may want to see wildlife in their natural habitat. What options are available to them? They could go on a hike or on a safari, hoping to catch a glimpse of these animals. However, because nature is unpredictable, there is no guarantee of such sightings. Conversely a person could visit a relatively large zoo, and see an abundance of different types of animals, meticulously presented for visitor enjoyment. But this kind of experience may leave patrons feeling as if they are missing out on an authentic experience.

This tension extends beyond wildlife encounters to various facets of life, from relationships, to clothing, to personal style, and to cuisine and cultural experiences. For instance, the experience of eating Japanese food differs significantly between indulging in it stateside versus savoring it in its country of origin.

But why does this tension matter? At its core, the struggle between authenticity and curation reflects deeper societal desires and values. It speaks to our longing for genuine connections, meaningful experiences, and a sense of belonging in an increasingly digital world. Moreover, it underscores the importance of understanding how our choices—whether to seek authenticity or embrace curation—affect our perceptions and interactions. 

So, what insights can we glean from this exploration? First, it’s essential to acknowledge that the tension between authenticity and curation is multifaceted and nuanced, resource dependent, manifesting in diverse contexts and experiences. Second, recognizing the underlying motivations behind our preferences can assist us to make more informed decisions and navigate the tension between authenticity and curation with greater clarity and intentionality.

Ultimately, by understanding and perhaps engaging with this tension thoughtfully and critically, we can strive to strike a balance among our wants, needs and desires in our search for or acknowledgement of authenticity and curation. In doing so, we may be able to foster genuine connections, enriching experiences (and relationships) and a deeper understanding of ourselves and the world around us. This journey does not offer any guarantees that we will be happier or more content, but if it gives us more clarity then perhaps it’s worth embarking upon.

Photo credit:

Photographer: Jack Delano

Title: A freak show at the Rutland Fair in Rutland, Vermont.